Random Articles (Page 15)

Have a deep view into what people are curious about.

πŸ”— Seikilos epitaph

πŸ”— Classical Greece and Rome

The Seikilos epitaph is the oldest surviving complete musical composition, including musical notation, from anywhere in the world. The epitaph has been variously dated, but seems to be either from the 1st or the 2nd century AD. The song, the melody of which is recorded, alongside its lyrics, in the ancient Greek musical notation, was found engraved on a tombstone (a stele) from the Hellenistic town Tralles near present-day AydΔ±n, Turkey, not far from Ephesus. It is a Hellenistic Ionic song in either the Phrygian octave species or Iastian tonos. While older music with notation exists (for example the Hurrian songs), all of it is in fragments; the Seikilos epitaph is unique in that it is a complete, though short, composition.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Product Red

πŸ”— Brands πŸ”— Health and fitness πŸ”— AIDS πŸ”— U2

Product Red, stylized as (PRODUCT)RED or (PRODUCT)RED, is a licensed brand by the company Red, stylized as (RED), that seeks to engage the private sector in raising awareness and funds to help eliminate HIV/AIDS in eight African countries, namely Eswatini (formerly Swaziland), Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia. It is licensed to partner companies including Apple Inc., Nike, American Express (UK), The Coca-Cola Company, Starbucks, Converse, Electronic Arts, Primark, Head, Buckaroo, Penguin Classics (UK & International), Gap, Armani, FIAT, Hallmark (US), SAP, Beats Electronics, and Supercell. The concept was founded in 2006 by U2 frontman and activist Bono, together with Bobby Shriver of the One Campaign and DATA. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is the recipient of Product Red's money.

As part of a new business model, each partner company creates a product with the Product Red logo. In return for the opportunity to increase revenue through the Product Red license, up to 50% of profits gained by each partner is donated to the Global Fund. As Product Red is owned by Red, a portion of the contributions received from the partner brands is assigned as profit. Such an amalgamation of humanitarian aid and for-profit businesses is one example of "ethical consumerism".

In 2012, One Campaign acquired Red as a division of One. Both organizations were co-founded by Bono and Shriver.

Since 2020, Product Red has been used in the global fund to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Proportion-Integral-Derivative Controllers

πŸ”— Systems πŸ”— Systems/Control theory

A proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller, or three-term controller, is a feedback-based control loop mechanism commonly used to manage machines and processes that require continuous control and automatic adjustment. It is typically used in industrial control systems and various other applications where constant control through modulation is necessary without human intervention. The PID controller automatically compares the desired target value (setpoint or SP) with the actual value of the system (process variable or PV). The difference between these two values is called the error value, denoted as e ( t ) {\displaystyle e(t)} .

It then applies corrective actions automatically to bring the PV to the same value as the SP using three methods: The proportional (P) component responds to the current error value by producing an output that is directly proportional to the magnitude of the error. This provides immediate correction based on how far the system is from the desired setpoint. The integral (I) component, in turn, considers the cumulative sum of past errors to address any residual steady-state errors that persist over time, eliminating lingering discrepancies. Lastly, the derivative (D) component predicts future error by assessing the rate of change of the error, which helps to mitigate overshoot and enhance system stability, particularly when the system undergoes rapid changes. The PID output signal can directly control actuators through voltage, current, or other modulation methods, depending on the application. The PID controller reduces the likelihood of human error and improves automation.

A common example is a vehicle’s cruise control system. For instance, when a vehicle encounters a hill, its speed will decrease if the engine power output is kept constant. The PID controller adjusts the engine's power output to restore the vehicle to its desired speed, doing so efficiently with minimal delay and overshoot.

The theoretical foundation of PID controllers dates back to the early 1920s with the development of automatic steering systems for ships. This concept was later adopted for automatic process control in manufacturing, first appearing in pneumatic actuators and evolving into electronic controllers. PID controllers are widely used in numerous applications requiring accurate, stable, and optimized automatic control, such as temperature regulation, motor speed control, and industrial process management.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Legendre's constant

πŸ”— Mathematics

Legendre's constant is a mathematical constant occurring in a formula conjectured by Adrien-Marie Legendre to capture the asymptotic behavior of the prime-counting function Ο€ ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} . Its value is now known to be exactlyΒ 1.

Examination of available numerical evidence for known primes led Legendre to suspect that Ο€ ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} satisfies an approximate formula.

Legendre conjectured in 1808 that

Ο€ ( x ) = x ln ⁑ ( x ) βˆ’ B ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)={\frac {x}{\ln(x)-B(x)}}}

where lim x β†’ ∞ B ( x ) = 1.08366 {\displaystyle \lim _{x\to \infty }B(x)=1.08366} ....OEIS:Β A228211

Or similarly,

lim n β†’ ∞ ( ln ⁑ ( n ) βˆ’ n Ο€ ( n ) ) = B {\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }\left(\ln(n)-{n \over \pi (n)}\right)=B}

where B is Legendre's constant. He guessed B to be about 1.08366, but regardless of its exact value, the existence of B implies the prime number theorem.

Pafnuty Chebyshev proved in 1849 that if the limit B exists, it must be equal to 1. An easier proof was given by Pintz in 1980.

It is an immediate consequence of the prime number theorem, under the precise form with an explicit estimate of the error term

Ο€ ( x ) = L i ( x ) + O ( x e βˆ’ a ln ⁑ x ) asΒ  x β†’ ∞ {\displaystyle \pi (x)={\rm {Li}}(x)+O\left(xe^{-a{\sqrt {\ln x}}}\right)\quad {\text{as }}x\to \infty }

(for some positive constant a, where O(…) is the big O notation), as proved in 1899 by Charles de La VallΓ©e Poussin, that B indeed is equal to 1. (The prime number theorem had been proved in 1896, independently by Jacques Hadamard and La VallΓ©e Poussin, but without any estimate of the involved error term).

Being evaluated to such a simple number has made the term Legendre's constant mostly only of historical value, with it often (technically incorrectly) being used to refer to Legendre's first guess 1.08366... instead.

Pierre Dusart proved in 2010

x ln ⁑ x βˆ’ 1 < Ο€ ( x ) {\displaystyle {\frac {x}{\ln x-1}}<\pi (x)} for x β‰₯ 5393 {\displaystyle x\geq 5393} , and
Ο€ ( x ) < x ln ⁑ x βˆ’ 1.1 {\displaystyle \pi (x)<{\frac {x}{\ln x-1.1}}} for x β‰₯ 60184 {\displaystyle x\geq 60184} . This is of the same form as
Ο€ ( x ) = x ln ⁑ ( x ) βˆ’ B ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)={\frac {x}{\ln(x)-B(x)}}} with 1 < B ( x ) < 1.1 {\displaystyle 1<B(x)<1.1} .

Discussed on

πŸ”— Stochastic Parrot

πŸ”— Computer science πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Contemporary philosophy πŸ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of mind πŸ”— Artificial Intelligence

In machine learning, "stochastic parrot" is a term coined by Emily M. Bender in the 2021 artificial intelligence research paper "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?" by Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Margaret Mitchell. The term refers to "large language models that are impressive in their ability to generate realistic-sounding language but ultimately do not truly understand the meaning of the language they are processing."

Discussed on

πŸ”— Grue and Bleen: New riddle of induction

πŸ”— Philosophy πŸ”— Color

Grue and bleen are examples of logical predicates coined by Nelson Goodman in Fact, Fiction, and Forecast to illustrate the "new riddle of induction" – a successor to Hume's original problem. These predicates are unusual because their application is time-dependent; many have tried to solve the new riddle on those terms, but Hilary Putnam and others have argued such time-dependency depends on the language adopted, and in some languages it is equally true for natural-sounding predicates such as "green." For Goodman they illustrate the problem of projectible predicates and ultimately, which empirical generalizations are law-like and which are not. Goodman's construction and use of grue and bleen illustrates how philosophers use simple examples in conceptual analysis.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Underwater Basket Weaving

πŸ”— Education

Underwater basket weaving is an idiom referring pejoratively to supposedly useless or absurd college or university courses and often generally to refer to a perceived decline in educational standards.

The term also serves as an intentionally humorous generic answer to questions about an academic degree. It is also used to humorously refer to any non-academic elective course, specifically one that does not count towards any graduation requirements.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Finger Binary

πŸ”— Computing πŸ”— Mathematics

Finger binary is a system for counting and displaying binary numbers on the fingers of one or more hands. It is possible to count from 0 to 31 (25 βˆ’ 1) using the fingers of a single hand, from 0 through 1023 (210 βˆ’ 1) if both hands are used, or from 0 to 1,048,575 (220 βˆ’ 1) if the toes on both feet are used as well.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Lady Tasting Tea

πŸ”— Mathematics πŸ”— Statistics

In the design of experiments in statistics, the lady tasting tea is a randomized experiment devised by Ronald Fisher and reported in his book The Design of Experiments (1935). The experiment is the original exposition of Fisher's notion of a null hypothesis, which is "never proved or established, but is possibly disproved, in the course of experimentation".

The example is loosely based on an event in Fisher's life. The woman in question, phycologist Muriel Bristol, claimed to be able to tell whether the tea or the milk was added first to a cup. Her future husband, William Roach, suggested that Fisher give her eight cups, four of each variety, in random order. One could then ask what the probability was for her getting the specific number of cups she identified correct (in fact all eight), but just by chance.

Fisher's description is less than 10 pages in length and is notable for its simplicity and completeness regarding terminology, calculations and design of the experiment. The test used was Fisher's exact test.

Discussed on