New Articles (Page 241)

To stay up to date you can also follow on Mastodon.

๐Ÿ”— Burning Ship Fractal

๐Ÿ”— Systems ๐Ÿ”— Systems/Chaos theory

The Burning Ship fractal, first described and created by Michael Michelitsch and Otto E. Rรถssler in 1992, is generated by iterating the function:

z n + 1 = ( | Re โก ( z n ) | + i | Im โก ( z n ) | ) 2 + c , z 0 = 0 {\displaystyle z_{n+1}=(|\operatorname {Re} \left(z_{n}\right)|+i|\operatorname {Im} \left(z_{n}\right)|)^{2}+c,\quad z_{0}=0}

in the complex plane C {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } which will either escape or remain bounded. The difference between this calculation and that for the Mandelbrot set is that the real and imaginary components are set to their respective absolute values before squaring at each iteration. The mapping is non-analytic because its real and imaginary parts do not obey the Cauchyโ€“Riemann equations.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Free beer

๐Ÿ”— Computing ๐Ÿ”— Denmark ๐Ÿ”— Food and drink ๐Ÿ”— Beer

Free Beer, originally known as Vores รธl - An open source beer (Danish for: Our Beer), is the first brand of beer with an "open"/"free" brand and recipe. The recipe and trademark elements are published under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA license.

The beer was created in 2004 by students at the IT University in Copenhagen together with artist collective Superflex, to illustrate how concepts of the FOSS movement might be applied outside the digital world. The "Free Beer" concept illustrates also the connection between the long tradition of freely sharing cooking recipes with the FOSS movement, which tries to establish this sharing tradition also for the "recipes" of software, the source code. The "Free beer" concept received an overall positive reception from international press and media for the political message, was presented on many exhibitions and conferences, and inspired many breweries in adopting the concept.

๐Ÿ”— Guanxi

๐Ÿ”— China ๐Ÿ”— Psychology

Guanxi (simplified Chinese: ๅ…ณ็ณป; traditional Chinese: ้—œไฟ‚; pinyin: guฤnxi) defines the fundamental dynamic in personalized social networks of power, and is a crucial system of beliefs in Chinese culture. In Western media, the pinyin romanization of this Chinese word is becoming more widely used instead of the two common translations of itโ€”"connections" and "relationships"โ€”as neither of those terms sufficiently reflects the wide cultural implications that guanxi describes.

Guanxi plays a fundamental role within the Confucian doctrine, which sees the individual as part of a community and a set of family, hierarchical and friendly relationships. In particular, there is a focus on tacit mutual commitments, reciprocity, and trust, which are the grounds of guanxi and guanxi networks.

Guanxi also has a major influence on the management of businesses based in Mainland China, and businesses owned by Overseas Chinese in Southeast Asia (the latter is known as the bamboo network).

Closely related concepts include that of ganqing, a measure which reflects the depth of feeling within an interpersonal relationship, renqing (ไบบๆƒ… rรฉnqรญng/jen-ch'ing), the moral obligation to maintain a relationship, and the idea of "face" (้ขๅญ, miร nzi/mien-tzu), which refers to social status, propriety, prestige, or a combination of all three. Other related concepts include wu-lune, which supports the idea of a long term, developing relationship between a business and its client, and yi-ren and ren, which respectively support reciprocity and empathy.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— De Bono's Six Thinking Hats

๐Ÿ”— Books ๐Ÿ”— Systems ๐Ÿ”— Business ๐Ÿ”— Psychology ๐Ÿ”— United Kingdom ๐Ÿ”— Engineering ๐Ÿ”— Invention ๐Ÿ”— Systems/Project management ๐Ÿ”— Method engineering

Six Thinking Hats was written by Dr. Edward de Bono. "Six Thinking Hats" and the associated idea parallel thinking provide a means for groups to plan thinking processes in a detailed and cohesive way, and in doing so to think together more effectively.

In 2005, the tool found some use in the United Kingdom innovation sector, where it was offered by some facilitation companies and had been trialled within the United Kingdom's civil service.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Skeuomorph

๐Ÿ”— Apple Inc./Macintosh ๐Ÿ”— Apple Inc. ๐Ÿ”— Humanโ€“Computer Interaction ๐Ÿ”— Industrial design ๐Ÿ”— Apple Inc./iOS

A skeuomorph () is a derivative object that retains nonfunctional ornamental design cues (attributes) from structures that were inherent to the original. Examples include pottery embellished with imitation rivets reminiscent of similar pots made of metal and a software calendar that imitates the appearance of binding on a paper desk calendar.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Vega program

๐Ÿ”— Soviet Union ๐Ÿ”— Spaceflight ๐Ÿ”— Solar System

The Vega program (Cyrillic: ะ’ะตะ“ะฐ) was a series of Venus missions that also took advantage of the appearance of comet 1P/Halley in 1986. Vega 1 and Vega 2 were uncrewed spacecraft launched in a cooperative effort among the Soviet Union (who also provided the spacecraft and launch vehicle) and Austria, Bulgaria, France, Hungary, the German Democratic Republic, Poland, Czechoslovakia, and the Federal Republic of Germany in December 1984. They had a two-part mission to investigate Venus and also flyby Halley's Comet.

The flyby of Halley's Comet had been a late mission change in the Venera program following on from the cancellation of the American Halley mission in 1981. A later Venera mission was canceled and the Venus part of the Vega 1 mission was reduced. Because of this, the craft was designated VeGa, a contraction of Venera and Gallei (ะ’ะตะฝะตั€ะฐ and ะ“ะฐะปะปะตั respectively, the Russian words for "Venus" and "Halley"). The spacecraft design was based on the previous Venera 9 and Venera 10 missions.

The two spacecraft were launched on 15 and 21 December 1984, respectively. With their redesignated dual missions, the Vega probes became part of the Halley Armada, a group of space probes that studied Halley's Comet during its 1985/1986 perihelion.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Turtles All the Way Down

๐Ÿ”— Philosophy ๐Ÿ”— Philosophy/Philosophy of religion

"Turtles all the way down" is an expression of the problem of infinite regress. The saying alludes to the mythological idea of a World Turtle that supports the earth on its back. It suggests that this turtle rests on the back of an even larger turtle, which itself is part of a column of increasingly large world turtles that continues indefinitely (i.e., "turtles all the way down").

The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain. In the form "rocks all the way down", the saying appears as early as 1838. References to the saying's mythological antecedents, the World Turtle and its counterpart the World Elephant, were made by a number of authors in the 17th and 18th centuries. This mythology is frequently assumed to have originated in ancient India and other Hinduist beliefs.

The expression has been used to illustrate problems such as the regress argument in epistemology.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Interactive EasyFlow

Interactive EasyFlow was one of the first diagramming and flow charting software packages available for personal computers. This product was the flagship software produced by HavenTree Software Limited, of Kingston, Ontario Canada. HavenTree software, formed in 1981, offered predecessor non-interactive products "EasyFlow" (1983) and "EasyFlow-Plus" (1984). Interactive EasyFlow - so named to distinguish it from the preceding products - was offered from 1985 until the early 1990s, when the company dropped the "Interactive" adjective in favour of simply "HavenTree EasyFlow". It offered the software for sale until it filed for protection under Canada's Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act in April 1996. The assets of the company were purchased by SPSS Inc. in 1998.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Holodomor

๐Ÿ”— Human rights ๐Ÿ”— Soviet Union ๐Ÿ”— Crime ๐Ÿ”— Death ๐Ÿ”— Philosophy ๐Ÿ”— Discrimination ๐Ÿ”— Philosophy/Ethics ๐Ÿ”— Soviet Union/history of Russia ๐Ÿ”— Soviet Union/Russia ๐Ÿ”— Ukraine ๐Ÿ”— Ethnic groups

The Holodomor (Ukrainian: ะ“ะพะปะพะดะพะผะพฬั€; ะ“ะพะปะพะดะพะผะพฬั€ ะฒ ะฃะบั€ะฐั—ฬะฝั–; derived from ะผะพั€ะธั‚ะธ ะณะพะปะพะดะพะผ, "to kill by starvation") was a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine in 1932 and 1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. It is also known as the Terror-Famine and Famine-Genocide in Ukraine, and sometimes referred to as the Great Famine or the Ukrainian Genocide of 1932โ€“33. It was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1932โ€“33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country. During the Holodomor, millions of inhabitants of Ukraine, the majority of whom were ethnic Ukrainians, died of starvation in a peacetime catastrophe unprecedented in the history of Ukraine. Since 2006, the Holodomor has been recognized by Ukraine and 15 other countries as a genocide of the Ukrainian people carried out by the Soviet government.

Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials varied greatly. According to higher estimates, up to 12 million ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine. A U.N. joint statement signed by 25 countries in 2003 declared that 7โ€“10 million perished. Research has since narrowed the estimates to between 3.3 and 7.5 million. According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kiev in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficits.

The term Holodomor emphasises the famine's man-made and intentional aspects, such as rejection of outside aid, confiscation of all household foodstuffs, and restriction of population movement. Whether the Holodomor was genocide is still the subject of academic debate, as are the causes of the famine and intentionality of the deaths. Some scholars believe that the famine was planned by Joseph Stalin to eliminate a Ukrainian independence movement. The loss of life has been compared to that of the Holocaust. However, some historians dispute its characterization as a genocide.

Discussed on