Random Articles (Page 3)
Have a deep view into what people are curious about.
π Parrondo's paradox
Parrondo's paradox, a paradox in game theory, has been described as: A combination of losing strategies becomes a winning strategy. It is named after its creator, Juan Parrondo, who discovered the paradox in 1996. A more explanatory description is:
- There exist pairs of games, each with a higher probability of losing than winning, for which it is possible to construct a winning strategy by playing the games alternately.
Parrondo devised the paradox in connection with his analysis of the Brownian ratchet, a thought experiment about a machine that can purportedly extract energy from random heat motions popularized by physicist Richard Feynman. However, the paradox disappears when rigorously analyzed. Winning strategies consisting of a combinations of losing strategies have been explored in biology before Parrondo's paradox was published. More recently, problems in evolutionary biology and ecology have been modeled and explained in terms of the paradox.
Discussed on
- "Parrondo's Paradox" | 2023-04-28 | 69 Upvotes 48 Comments
- "Parrondo's paradox" | 2011-11-16 | 41 Upvotes 7 Comments
- "Parrondo's paradox: A losing strategy that wins" | 2010-06-01 | 43 Upvotes 12 Comments
π Trial and Execution of Nicolae and Elena CeauΘescu
The trial of Nicolae and Elena CeauΘescu was held on 25 December 1989 by an Exceptional Military Tribunal, a drumhead court-martial created at the request of a newly formed group called the National Salvation Front. Its outcome was pre-determined, and it resulted in guilty verdicts and death sentences for former Romanian President and Romanian Communist Party General Secretary, Nicolae CeauΘescu, and his wife, Elena CeauΘescu.
The main charge was genocideβ namely, murdering "over 60,000 people" during the revolution in TimiΘoara. Other sources put the death toll between 689 and 1,200. Nevertheless, the charges did not affect the trial. General Victor StΔnculescu had brought with him a specially selected team of paratroopers from a crack regiment, handpicked earlier in the morning to act as a firing squad. Before the legal proceedings began, StΔnculescu had already selected the spot where the execution would take place: along one side of the wall in the barracks' square.
Nicolae CeauΘescu refused to recognize the tribunal, arguing its lack of constitutional basis and claiming that the revolutionary authorities were part of a Soviet plot.
Discussed on
- "Trial and Execution of Nicolae and Elena CeauΘescu" | 2022-12-07 | 19 Upvotes 7 Comments
π Wikipedia: Size in volumes
This page displays the current size of a hypothetical print edition of the English Wikipedia (without images) in print volumes, per mathematical calculation.
Discussed on
- "Wikipedia: Size in volumes" | 2013-08-20 | 112 Upvotes 41 Comments
π Homoiconicity
In computer programming, homoiconicity (from the Greek words homo- meaning "the same" and icon meaning "representation") is a property of some programming languages. A language is homoiconic if a program written in it can be manipulated as data using the language, and thus the program's internal representation can be inferred just by reading the program itself. For example, a Lisp program is written as a regular Lisp list, and can be manipulated by other Lisp code. In homoiconic languages, all code can be accessed and transformed as data, using the same representation. This property is often summarized by saying that the language treats "code as data".
In a homoiconic language, the primary representation of programs is also a data structure in a primitive type of the language itself. This makes metaprogramming easier than in a language without this property: reflection in the language (examining the program's entities at runtime) depends on a single, homogeneous structure, and it does not have to handle several different structures that would appear in a complex syntax.
As noted above, a commonly cited example is Lisp, which was created to allow for easy list manipulations and where the structure is given by S-expressions that take the form of nested lists. Lisp programs are written in the form of lists; the result is that the program can access its own functions and procedures while running, and programmatically alter itself on the fly. Homoiconic languages typically include full support of syntactic macros, allowing the programmer to express transformations of programs in a concise way. Examples are the programming languages Clojure (a contemporary dialect of Lisp), Rebol (also its successor Red), Refal, Prolog, and more recently Julia.
Discussed on
- "Homoiconicity" | 2016-01-19 | 20 Upvotes 5 Comments
π Lockheed CL-1201 nuclear-powered transport aircraft concept
The Lockheed CL-1201 was a design study by Lockheed for a giant 6,000 ton nuclear-powered transport aircraft in the late 1960s. One envisioned use of the concept was as an airborne aircraft carrier.
Discussed on
- "Lockheed CL-1201 nuclear-powered transport aircraft concept" | 2024-08-25 | 23 Upvotes 2 Comments
π Expert Wizard Amendment
The expert wizard amendment was a proposed amendment by New Mexico state senator Duncan Scott, which would require psychologists and psychiatrists to dress up as wizards when they were in court proceedings providing expert testimony regarding a defendant's competency. The amendment, proposed in 1995, passed New Mexico's Senate unanimously. Scott revealed the amendment was satirical prior to a vote in New Mexico House of Representatives following which it was removed and thus never signed into law.
Scott said that he crafted the amendment because he felt that there were an excessive number of mental health practitioners acting as expert witnesses.
π Wikipedia Reference Desk: Ask questions by topic, Wikipedia volunteers answer
Discussed on
- "Wikipedia Reference Desk: Ask questions by topic, Wikipedia volunteers answer" | 2023-04-12 | 16 Upvotes 1 Comments
π You ain't gonna need it
"You aren't gonna need it" (YAGNI) is a principle of extreme programming (XP) that states a programmer should not add functionality until deemed necessary. XP co-founder Ron Jeffries has written: "Always implement things when you actually need them, never when you just foresee that you need them." Other forms of the phrase include "You aren't going to need it" and "You ain't gonna need it".
Discussed on
- "You ain't gonna need it" | 2010-02-23 | 20 Upvotes 3 Comments
π Dennis Ritchie
Dennis MacAlistair Ritchie (September 9, 1941 β c. October 12, 2011) was an American computer scientist. He created the C programming language and, with long-time colleague Ken Thompson, the Unix operating system and B programming language. Ritchie and Thompson were awarded the Turing Award from the ACM in 1983, the Hamming Medal from the IEEE in 1990 and the National Medal of Technology from President Bill Clinton in 1999. Ritchie was the head of Lucent Technologies System Software Research Department when he retired in 2007. He was the "R" in K&R C, and commonly known by his username dmr.
Discussed on
- "Dennis Ritchie" | 2011-10-13 | 243 Upvotes 1 Comments
π Michel de Montaigne
Michel Eyquem, Seigneur de Montaigne ( mon-TAYN; French:Β [miΚΙl ekΙm dΙ mΙΜtΙΙ²]; 28 February 1533Β β 13 September 1592), known as Michel de Montaigne, was one of the most significant philosophers of the French Renaissance. He is known for popularizing the essay as a literary genre. His work is noted for its merging of casual anecdotes and autobiography with intellectual insight. Montaigne had a direct influence on numerous Western writers; his massive volume Essais contains some of the most influential essays ever written.
During his lifetime, Montaigne was admired more as a statesman than as an author. The tendency in his essays to digress into anecdotes and personal ruminations was seen as detrimental to proper style rather than as an innovation, and his declaration that "I am myself the matter of my book" was viewed by his contemporaries as self-indulgent. In time, however, Montaigne came to be recognized as embodying, perhaps better than any other author of his time, the spirit of freely entertaining doubt that began to emerge at that time. He is most famously known for his skeptical remark, ''Que sΓ§ay-je?" ("What do I know?", in Middle French; now rendered as "Que sais-je?" in modern French).
Discussed on
- "Michel de Montaigne" | 2023-05-23 | 110 Upvotes 38 Comments