Random Articles (Page 347)

Have a deep view into what people are curious about.

๐Ÿ”— The "If By Whiskey" speech

๐Ÿ”— United States ๐Ÿ”— Biography ๐Ÿ”— Biography/politics and government ๐Ÿ”— United States/Mississippi

Judge Noah S. "Soggy" Sweat, Jr. (October 2, 1922ย โ€“ February 23, 1996) was a judge, law professor, and state representative in the U.S. state of Mississippi, notable for his 1952 speech on the floor of the Mississippi state legislature concerning whiskey. Reportedly the speech took Sweat two and a half months to write. The speech is renowned for the grand rhetorical terms in which it seems to come down firmly and decisively on both sides of the question. The speech gave rise to the phrase if-by-whiskey, used to illustrate such equivocation in argument.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— The Shock Doctrine

๐Ÿ”— Medicine ๐Ÿ”— Economics ๐Ÿ”— Books ๐Ÿ”— Politics ๐Ÿ”— Women writers ๐Ÿ”— Medicine/Psychiatry

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism is a 2007 book by the Canadian author and social activist Naomi Klein. In the book, Klein argues that neoliberal free market policies (as advocated by the economist Milton Friedman) have risen to prominence in some developed countries because of a deliberate strategy of "shock therapy". This centers on the exploitation of national crises (disasters or upheavals) to establish controversial and questionable policies, while citizens are excessively distracted (emotionally and physically) to engage and develop an adequate response, and resist effectively. The book suggests that some man-made events, such as the Iraq War, were undertaken with the intention of pushing through such unpopular policies in their wake.

Some reviewers criticized the book for making what they viewed as simplifications of political phenomena, while others lauded it as a compelling and important work. The book served as the main source of a 2009 documentary feature film with the same title directed by Michael Winterbottom.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— One Laptop per Child

๐Ÿ”— Computing ๐Ÿ”— Computing/Computer hardware ๐Ÿ”— Environment ๐Ÿ”— International development

One Laptop per Child (OLPC) was a non-profit initiative established with the goal of transforming education for children around the world; this goal was to be achieved by creating and distributing educational devices for the developing world, and by creating software and content for those devices.

The goal was to transform education, by enabling children in low-income countries to have access to content, media and computer-programming environments. When the program launched, the typical retail price for a laptop was considerably in excess of $1,000 (US), so achieving this objective required bringing a low-cost machine to production. This became the OLPC XO Laptop, a low-cost and low-power laptop computer designed by Yves Bรฉhar. The project was originally funded by member organizations such as AMD, eBay, Google, Marvell Technology Group, News Corporation, Nortel. Chi Mei Corporation, Red Hat, and Quanta provided in-kind support.

The OLPC project was the subject of much discussion. It was praised for pioneering low-cost, low-power laptops and inspiring later variants such as Eee PCs and Chromebooks; for assuring consensus at ministerial level in many countries that computer literacy is a mainstream part of education; for creating interfaces that worked without literacy in any language, and particularly without literacy in English. It was criticized from many sides regarding its US-centric focus ignoring bigger problems, high total costs, low focus on maintainability and training and its limited success. In 2014, after disappointing sales, the Foundation shut down.

The OLPC project is critically reviewed in a 2019 MIT Press book titled The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop per Child.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— How to get bias into a Wikipedia article

Tilt! How to get bias into a Wikipedia article

To all you budding propagandists in Wikiland: too many of you are working like a bunch of amateurs. Sorry to be so negative, but you have to understand that getting bias into the Wikipedia is a skill; it requires practice, finesse and imagination. It has to be learned; it is not a natural thing, though some have more talent for it than others.

I have been following the Middle East Wikipedia battleground for a few years now, and have been very impressed with the skill of some editors in introducing bias into articles. To ingenuous editors, some of these techniques may seem innocuous enough; in many cases, it is hard to see how proposed edits are biasing an article one way or another. It is, in fact, only in the last few months that I have been able to define what these techniques are and how they work to introduce bias.

The first thing you need to know as a budding propagandist is this: there are two levels at which bias is introduced into the Wikipedia: at the article level, and at the topic level. You need to set your sights high: you don't want to merely bias a single article, you want the entire Wikipedia on your side. Without understanding the importance of topic bias, it is hard to understand many of the article-level techniques, so I will start with the topic level.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— List of things named after Leonhard Euler

๐Ÿ”— Russia ๐Ÿ”— Mathematics ๐Ÿ”— Russia/science and education in Russia ๐Ÿ”— Switzerland ๐Ÿ”— Anthroponymy

In mathematics and physics, many topics are named in honor of Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler (1707โ€“1783), who made many important discoveries and innovations. Many of these items named after Euler include their own unique function, equation, formula, identity, number (single or sequence), or other mathematical entity. Many of these entities have been given simple and ambiguous names such as Euler's function, Euler's equation, and Euler's formula.

Euler's work touched upon so many fields that he is often the earliest written reference on a given matter. In an effort to avoid naming everything after Euler, some discoveries and theorems are attributed to the first person to have proved them after Euler.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Nine-nine-six (996) Working Hour System

๐Ÿ”— Companies ๐Ÿ”— China ๐Ÿ”— Organized Labour

The 996 working hour system (Chinese: 996ๅทฅไฝœๅˆถ) is a work schedule commonly practiced by some companies in the People's Republic of China. It derives its name from its requirement that employees work from 9:00 am to 9:00 pm, 6 days per week; i.e. 72 hours per week. A number of Chinese internet companies have adopted this system as their official work schedule. Critics argue that the 996 working hour system is a flagrant violation of Chinese law.

In March 2019 an "anti-996" protest was launched via GitHub.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Hobby Tunneling

๐Ÿ”— Bridges and Tunnels ๐Ÿ”— Civil engineering

Hobby tunneling (or tunnelling) is tunnel construction as a diversion. Usually, hobby tunnelers dig their tunnels by hand, using little equipment, and some can spend years or even decades to achieve any degree of completion. In some cases tunnels have been dug secretly, and only discovered by chance.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— Chants of Sennaar

๐Ÿ”— Video games ๐Ÿ”— Video games/indie

Chants of Sennaar is a 2023 adventure video game developed by Rundisc and published by Focus Entertainment. Players solve puzzles and minigames to translate fictional languages.

Discussed on

๐Ÿ”— User: Larry Sanger/Nine Theses

ย submit these nine theses to Wikipediaโ€™s community and to the world. I do this, as Martin Luther said when he posted his famous 95 theses, โ€œOut of love for the truth and the desire to elucidate it.โ€

A quarter of a century ago, Jimmy Walesโ€™ company Bomis hired me to start a free encyclopedia. The first draft, from which we learned much, was Nupediaโ€”it made slow progress. So, a year later, on January 2, 2001, when a friend told me about wikis, I immediately began imagining a wiki encyclopedia. I proposed it to Jimmy, then CEO of Bomis. He agreed and installed the software, and I went to work getting things ready. After I named it, we launched Wikipedia on January 15, 2001, and just nine days later, I was able to write, โ€œWikipedia has definitely taken on a life of its own; new people are arriving every day and the project seems to be getting only more popular. Long live Wikipedia!โ€

The title I claimed at the time was โ€œchief instigator.โ€ My daily leadership for the 14 months after that was essential to transforming a completely empty, blank wiki into what would soon become the largest written resource in the history of the world. I was responsible for several policies that were and are fundamental to the project: the exclusive focus on an encyclopedia; neutrality; โ€œno original researchโ€; โ€œbe boldโ€; aspects of the verifiability policy; and other things. I even proposed the tongue-in-cheek โ€œruleโ€ to โ€œignore all rules.โ€ For more, see this page on my role in Wikipedia, my Slashdot memoir, and my book, Essays on Free Knowledge. I say these things not to brag but to show why my proposals deserve a careful hearing.

I carefully chose and worded the following nine theses to appeal to the universal concern for truth and justice. I have worked for many months on this project. I am confident that every thesis stands on solid ground. Some Wikipedians, wedded to the current system, might be inclined to reject them; but many others, as well as the broader world, will be able to see that they are quite reasonable. I hope that the Wikipedia community will do the necessary introspection and find ways to make these proposals a reality. I also hope the broader world will join the discussion on each point and press Wikipediaโ€™s leadership as well as rank-and-file editors to adopt them, for the good of all.

Please note that there are nine lengthy essays to go with the nine theses.

Discussed on