Popular Articles (Page 15)
Hint: You are looking at the most popular articles. If you are interested in popular topics instead, click here.
🔗 Naturally-Occurring Nuclear Reactors
A fossil natural nuclear fission reactor is a uranium deposit where self-sustaining nuclear chain reactions have occurred. This can be examined by analysis of isotope ratios. The conditions under which a natural nuclear reactor could exist had been predicted in 1956 by Paul Kazuo Kuroda. The phenomenon was discovered in 1972 in Oklo, Gabon by French physicist Francis Perrin under conditions very similar to what was predicted.
Oklo is the only known location for this in the world and consists of 16 sites at which self-sustaining nuclear fission reactions are thought to have taken place approximately 1.7 billion years ago, and ran for a few hundred thousand years, averaging probably less than 100 kW of thermal power during that time.
Discussed on
- "Natural Nuclear Fission Reactor" | 2022-05-07 | 10 Upvotes 1 Comments
- "Natural Nuclear Fission Reactor" | 2020-10-10 | 49 Upvotes 8 Comments
- "Natural Nuclear Fission Reactor" | 2019-07-03 | 60 Upvotes 16 Comments
- "Natural nuclear fission reactor" | 2018-07-08 | 71 Upvotes 18 Comments
- "Natural nuclear fission reactor" | 2009-11-04 | 14 Upvotes 2 Comments
🔗 Wikipedia's robots.txt
Discussed on
- "Wikipedia's Robot.txt" | 2021-03-26 | 17 Upvotes 3 Comments
- "Wikipedia's robots.txt" | 2019-07-16 | 105 Upvotes 38 Comments
- "The wikipedia robots.txt" | 2011-10-28 | 42 Upvotes 3 Comments
🔗 Magic Roundabout (Swindon)
The Magic Roundabout in Swindon, England, is a ring junction constructed in 1972 consisting of five mini-roundabouts arranged in a circle around a sixth, central circle. Located near the County Ground, home of Swindon Town F.C., its name comes from the popular children's television series The Magic Roundabout. In 2009 it was voted the fourth scariest junction in Britain.
Discussed on
- "Magic Roundabout (Swindon)" | 2020-01-23 | 163 Upvotes 195 Comments
- "Magic Roundabout" | 2012-12-13 | 37 Upvotes 44 Comments
🔗 Transputer
The transputer is a series of pioneering microprocessors from the 1980s, featuring integrated memory and serial communication links, intended for parallel computing. They were designed and produced by Inmos, a semiconductor company based in Bristol, United Kingdom.
For some time in the late 1980s, many considered the transputer to be the next great design for the future of computing. While Inmos and the transputer did not achieve this expectation, the transputer architecture was highly influential in provoking new ideas in computer architecture, several of which have re-emerged in different forms in modern systems.
Discussed on
- "Transputer" | 2019-12-09 | 236 Upvotes 140 Comments
- "Transputer" | 2018-01-19 | 46 Upvotes 14 Comments
🔗 Wirth's Law
Wirth's law is an adage on computer performance which states that software is getting slower more rapidly than hardware is becoming faster.
The adage is named after Niklaus Wirth, who discussed it in his 1995 article "A Plea for Lean Software".
Discussed on
- "Wirth's Law" | 2025-07-26 | 19 Upvotes 6 Comments
- "Wirth's Law" | 2024-11-14 | 12 Upvotes 2 Comments
- "Wirth's Law" | 2022-07-17 | 15 Upvotes 8 Comments
- "Wirth's Law - Software gets slower more quickly than hardware gets faster" | 2016-10-16 | 40 Upvotes 8 Comments
- "Wirth's law" | 2016-03-20 | 10 Upvotes 3 Comments
🔗 User: Junnn11
Arthropod enthusiast, mainly focus on Panarthropod head problem, phylogeny across arthropod subphyla and stem lineage, basal chelicerates, dinocaridids and lobopodians. Sometime drawing stuff, not so well in english, mainly active at Japanese Wikipedia.
Japanese: 利用者:Junnn11
Commons: User:Junnn11
Twitter: ni075
Discussed on
- "User: Junnn11" | 2023-04-19 | 747 Upvotes 101 Comments
🔗 Banach–Tarski Paradox
The Banach–Tarski paradox is a theorem in set-theoretic geometry, which states the following: Given a solid ball in 3‑dimensional space, there exists a decomposition of the ball into a finite number of disjoint subsets, which can then be put back together in a different way to yield two identical copies of the original ball. Indeed, the reassembly process involves only moving the pieces around and rotating them without changing their shape. However, the pieces themselves are not "solids" in the usual sense, but infinite scatterings of points. The reconstruction can work with as few as five pieces.
A stronger form of the theorem implies that given any two "reasonable" solid objects (such as a small ball and a huge ball), the cut pieces of either one can be reassembled into the other. This is often stated informally as "a pea can be chopped up and reassembled into the Sun" and called the "pea and the Sun paradox".
The reason the Banach–Tarski theorem is called a paradox is that it contradicts basic geometric intuition. "Doubling the ball" by dividing it into parts and moving them around by rotations and translations, without any stretching, bending, or adding new points, seems to be impossible, since all these operations ought, intuitively speaking, to preserve the volume. The intuition that such operations preserve volumes is not mathematically absurd and it is even included in the formal definition of volumes. However, this is not applicable here because in this case it is impossible to define the volumes of the considered subsets. Reassembling them reproduces a volume, which happens to be different from the volume at the start.
Unlike most theorems in geometry, the proof of this result depends in a critical way on the choice of axioms for set theory. It can be proven using the axiom of choice, which allows for the construction of non-measurable sets, i.e., collections of points that do not have a volume in the ordinary sense, and whose construction requires an uncountable number of choices.
It was shown in 2005 that the pieces in the decomposition can be chosen in such a way that they can be moved continuously into place without running into one another.
Discussed on
- "Banach–Tarski Paradox" | 2024-06-26 | 62 Upvotes 75 Comments
- "Banach–Tarski Paradox" | 2015-07-22 | 11 Upvotes 5 Comments
- "Banach-Tarski paradox" | 2012-12-09 | 51 Upvotes 52 Comments
- "The Banach–Tarski paradox" | 2008-12-27 | 26 Upvotes 20 Comments
🔗 John Titor
John Titor (May 5, 6 or 7, 1998) is a name used on several bulletin boards during 2000 and 2001 by a poster claiming to be an American military time traveler from 2036. Titor made numerous vague and specific predictions regarding calamitous events in 2004 and beyond, including a nuclear war, none of which came true. Subsequent closer examination of Titor's assertions provoked widespread skepticism. Inconsistencies in his explanations, the uniform inaccuracy of his predictions, and a private investigator's findings all led to the general impression that the entire episode was an elaborate hoax. A 2009 investigation concluded that Titor was likely the creation of Larry Haber, a Florida entertainment lawyer, along with his brother Morey, a computer scientist.
Discussed on
- "John Titor" | 2020-03-12 | 206 Upvotes 170 Comments
🔗 Eigengrau
Eigengrau (German: "intrinsic gray", lit. "own gray"; pronounced [ˈʔaɪ̯gn̩ˌgʁaʊ̯]), also called Eigenlicht (Dutch and German: "own light"), dark light, or brain gray, is the uniform dark gray background that many people report seeing in the absence of light. The term Eigenlicht dates back to the nineteenth century, but has rarely been used in recent scientific publications. Common scientific terms for the phenomenon include "visual noise" or "background adaptation". These terms arise due to the perception of an ever-changing field of tiny black and white dots seen in the phenomenon.
Eigengrau is perceived as lighter than a black object in normal lighting conditions, because contrast is more important to the visual system than absolute brightness. For example, the night sky looks darker than Eigengrau because of the contrast provided by the stars.
Discussed on
- "Eigengrau" | 2021-07-11 | 73 Upvotes 23 Comments
- "Eigengrau" | 2013-06-23 | 217 Upvotes 68 Comments
🔗 List of games that Buddha would not play
The Buddhist games list is a list of games that Gautama Buddha is reputed to have said that he would not play and that his disciples should likewise not play, because he believed them to be a 'cause for negligence'. This list dates from the 6th or 5th century BCE and is the earliest known list of games.
There is some debate about the translation of some of the games mentioned, and the list given here is based on the translation by T. W. Rhys Davids of the Brahmajāla Sutta and is in the same order given in the original. The list is duplicated in a number of other early Buddhist texts, including the Vinaya Pitaka.
- Games on boards with 8 or 10 rows. This is thought to refer to ashtapada and dasapada respectively, but later Sinhala commentaries refer to these boards also being used with games involving dice.
- The same games played on imaginary boards. Akasam astapadam was an ashtapada variant played with no board, literally "astapadam played in the sky". A correspondent in the American Chess Bulletin identifies this as likely the earliest literary mention of a blindfold chess variant.
- Games of marking diagrams on the floor such that the player can only walk on certain places. This is described in the Vinaya Pitaka as "having drawn a circle with various lines on the ground, there they play avoiding the line to be avoided". Rhys Davids suggests that it may refer to parihāra-patham, a form of hop-scotch.
- Games where players either remove pieces from a pile or add pieces to it, with the loser being the one who causes the heap to shake (similar to the modern game pick-up sticks).
- Games of throwing dice.
- "Dipping the hand with the fingers stretched out in lac, or red dye, or flour-water, and striking the wet hand on the ground or on a wall, calling out 'What shall it be?' and showing the form required—elephants, horses, &c."
- Ball games.
- Blowing through a pat-kulal, a toy pipe made of leaves.
- Ploughing with a toy plough.
- Playing with toy windmills made from palm leaves.
- Playing with toy measures made from palm leaves.
- Playing with toy carts.
- Playing with toy bows.
- Guessing at letters traced with the finger in the air or on a friend's back.
- Guessing a friend's thoughts.
- Imitating deformities.
Although the modern game of chess had not been invented at the time the list was made, earlier chess-like games such as chaturaji may have existed. H.J.R. Murray refers to Rhys Davids' 1899 translation, noting that the 8×8 board game is most likely ashtapada while the 10×10 game is dasapada. He states that both are race games.
Discussed on
- "List of games that Buddha would not play" | 2025-06-24 | 13 Upvotes 6 Comments
- "List of games that Buddha would not play" | 2021-12-30 | 199 Upvotes 140 Comments
- "List of games that Buddha would not play" | 2020-08-12 | 24 Upvotes 9 Comments