Topic: Crime and Criminal Biography/Terrorism

You are looking at all articles with the topic "Crime and Criminal Biography/Terrorism". We found 3 matches.

Hint: To view all topics, click here. Too see the most popular topics, click here instead.

πŸ”— Greenland Crisis

πŸ”— United States/U.S. Government πŸ”— United States πŸ”— International relations πŸ”— Internet culture πŸ”— Military history πŸ”— Military history/North American military history πŸ”— Military history/United States military history πŸ”— United States/Military history - U.S. military history πŸ”— Military history/Military science, technology, and theory πŸ”— Politics πŸ”— Military history/Intelligence πŸ”— Denmark πŸ”— Arctic πŸ”— Politics/American politics πŸ”— Indigenous peoples of North America πŸ”— European history πŸ”— Military history/Nordic military history πŸ”— Conservatism πŸ”— Greenland πŸ”— United States/U.S. history πŸ”— Military history/European military history πŸ”— Military history/Post-Cold War πŸ”— Current events πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography/Terrorism πŸ”— Presidents of the United States πŸ”— Presidents of the United States/Donald Trump

Since 2025, the second Donald Trump administration of the United States has sought to annex Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark (itself in the European Union), triggering an ongoing international diplomatic crisis. This escalated in early 2026 after Trump refused to rule out the use of military force to annex Greenland and threatened a 25% import tax on European Union (EU) goods unless Denmark ceded Greenland. Trump's statements sparked a confrontation with Denmark and the EU (supported by several other NATO members), reigniting earlier concerns of a US–EU trade war. On 21 January, Trump reversed his position at the 2026 Davos conference, pledging not to use force or tariffs to annex Greenland.

Trump had unsuccessfully tried to purchase Greenland during his first presidency. After his 2024 re-election, in January 2026, he said "it may be a choice" whether to preserve NATO or seize Greenland and that he "no longer [felt] an obligation to think purely of Peace" after not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. A report by the Danish Defence Intelligence Service mentioned the United States (US) as a potential threat to national security for the first time in its history, and Danish officials raised concerns about reports that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard had assigned agents to spy on Greenland.

The Greenlandic and Danish prime ministers rejected any US takeover, saying they would defend Greenland in the event of an attack. Both NATO and EU members would be obliged to assist Denmark in the event of an attack. Denmark and eight NATO allies deployed forces to defend the territory. In response, Trump threatened a trade war against the EU, leading European politicians to suspend a proposed EU–US trade agreement and consider placing sanctions on the US.

Trump's threats led to large-scale protests in both Greenland and Denmark. A YouGov poll found only 8% of Americans supported an invasion of Greenland, with 73% opposed. Trump's actions faced heavy opposition in Congress from both major parties, with Republican speaker of the House Mike Johnson describing Trump's threats as "completely inappropriate" and a bipartisan congressional delegation traveling to Copenhagen to support Denmark–US relations. The crisis was described as one of the most erratic episodes involving a US president, prompting scrutiny of Trump's age and fitness for office.

On 21 January, Trump reversed course, first ruling out military force and then abandoning tariff threats after talks with NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte reached what Trump called a "framework of a future deal". Greenland and Denmark ruled out any deal altering the sovereignty of Greenland and Denmark, with Trump's comments referring to pre-existing commitments from a 1951 US–Denmark treaty.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Stochastic Terrorism

πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography/Terrorism

Stochastic terrorism is a form of political violence instigated by hostile public rhetoric directed at a group or an individual. Unlike incitement to terrorism, stochastic terrorism is accomplished with indirect, vague or coded language, which grants the instigator plausible deniability for any associated violence. A key element of stochastic terrorism is the use of media for propagation, where the person carrying out the violence may not have direct connection to any other users of violent rhetoric.

Discussed on

πŸ”— Sinking of the Rainbow Warrior

πŸ”— International relations πŸ”— France πŸ”— Military history πŸ”— Terrorism πŸ”— New Zealand πŸ”— Military history/Intelligence πŸ”— International relations/International law πŸ”— Military history/Maritime warfare πŸ”— Military history/French military history πŸ”— Shipwrecks πŸ”— International relations/United Nations πŸ”— New Zealand/New Zealand politics πŸ”— Military history/European military history πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography πŸ”— Crime and Criminal Biography/Terrorism πŸ”— Auckland

The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, codenamed OpΓ©ration Satanique, was a bombing operation by the "action" branch of the French foreign intelligence services, the Direction gΓ©nΓ©rale de la sΓ©curitΓ© extΓ©rieure (DGSE), carried out on 10 July 1985. During the operation, two operatives sank the flagship of the Greenpeace fleet, the Rainbow Warrior, at the Port of Auckland in New Zealand on its way to a protest against a planned French nuclear test in Moruroa. Fernando Pereira, a photographer, drowned on the sinking ship.

France initially denied responsibility, but two French agents were captured by New Zealand Police and charged with arson, conspiracy to commit arson, willful damage, and murder. As the truth came out, the scandal resulted in the resignation of the French Defence Minister Charles Hernu. The two agents pleaded guilty to manslaughter and were sentenced to ten years in prison. They spent a little over two years confined to the French island of Hao before being freed by the French government.

Several political figures, including then New Zealand Prime Minister David Lange, have referred to the bombing as an act of terrorism or state-sponsored terrorism.

Discussed on